Are we electing presidents now simply because of an expectation that somehow this person or that person is entitled to that once unsullied lofty office? How is Hillary Clinton entitled to the presidency? She is a proven liar, cheat and all-around self-serving sneak thief that only other morally bankrupt progressives would vote for, but still…she expects and so apparently does the media, that she still should be handed the job.
Being a woman is not the issue. If Hillary had the honor and dignity of someone like a Maggie Thatcher, she would have the qualifications necessary to conduct the business of the United States. But Hillary, like Barry, is an absolute fraud. These are people who make unforgivable mistakes in the name of progressivism, and then cover the mistakes with taxpayer dollars, threats or worse, the lives of Americans.
What makes Hillary eligible? Is it because she’s a shifty lawyer with skeletons in every closet? Do years as the wife of a cheating, lying pathetic excuse of a man give her presidential experience? Could it be her years in Congress where she skated along on everybody else’s coattails without lifting so much as a single finger to better the lives of anyone other than those whose votes she could buy with favors?
Maybe she is eligible because of her failure as a globe-trotting, but totally ineffectual Secretary of State who manged to kill four brave souls in Benghazi so that another Barry/Eric gun-running scheme would not be discovered. Maybe that is it.
If these are the qualifications of a president, then our prisons are filled with potential candidates. Perhaps even better candidates…